Re: Modula2 sucks. You should all program in C.

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #2805

#2805

From: Mark Greenaway
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 09:06

19 lines
1143 bytes

johnm@online.dct.com  (John McMonagle) writes:

>In <1995Sep6.224513.8508@relay.acadiau.ca>, 013639s@dragon.acadiau.ca (Kevin Swan) writes:
>>Its true.  Try it.
>>
>>Kev.
>>
>I'm doing some projects in C at the moment.  Since it takes longer 
>to write and debug it is financially more rewarding as I'm paid by the hour.

>As a side benefit the clients who specified C as the language find it
>to be unintelligible and I'm almost guarantied further maintenance work.

>Now if I could just convince them that Assembler is superior!

My question is this. Why did you even deem that obvious piece of flame 
bait worthy of response? You'll only encourage him/her...

Mark

Technical Details

Message-ID: <mgreenaw.810810276@lancelot.st.nepean.uws.edu.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lancelot.st.nepean.uws.edu.au!mgreenaw

References: <1995Sep6.224513.8508@relay.acadiau.ca> <42n35f$q36@online.dct.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lancelot.st.nepean.uws.edu.au!mgreenaw
From: mgreenaw@arthur.st.nepean.uws.edu.au (Mark Greenaway)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: Modula2 sucks. You should all program in C.
Date: 11 Sep 1995 19:06:00 +1000
Organization: University of Western Sydney
Message-ID: <mgreenaw.810810276@lancelot.st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
References: <1995Sep6.224513.8508@relay.acadiau.ca> <42n35f$q36@online.dct.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.154.148.14

Reply to Parent Message