Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #2828Re: Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++
From: "Mark Morgan Lloyd "
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 18:20
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 18:20
18 lines
1124 bytes
1124 bytes
Well, I can't really comment about C++, but if C were non-portable then all of the UNIX-related utilities- including TCP/IP as well as a lot of UNIX itself- would need changes each time they were moved to a new system. I've got common code running on three different platforms after compilation using Modula-2, my verdict being that the language is pretty portable but the implementation details enforced by the compilers are anything but. OTOH, I'm pretty sure that I would never have got a microkernel plus application ported between CPUs in a week irrespective of how good I was at C. Mark Morgan Lloyd mark_tbu@cix.compulink.co.uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DF60Ax.ADx@cix.compulink.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cix.compulink.co.uk!usenetReferences:
<FREEMAN.95Sep16141149@goelon.coolidge.grenoble.xerox.fr>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cix.compulink.co.uk!usenet
From: mark_tbu@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Mark Morgan Lloyd ")
Subject: Re: Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++
Message-ID: <DF60Ax.ADx@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Organization: KDG Mobrey Telemetry
References: <FREEMAN.95Sep16141149@goelon.coolidge.grenoble.xerox.fr>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 18:20:57 GMT
X-News-Software: Ameol