Re: Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++)

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #2915

#2915

From: "Mark Morgan Lloyd "
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 17:13

11 lines
794 bytes

> Horrid, snakey C code, like horrid, snakey FORTRAN, can almost always be
> clarified by breaking overly dense lines or tokens down into more parts,
> and explaining them as you go.

Yes. And most C devotees would immediately call it bad style.

Mark Morgan Lloyd
mark_tbu@cix.compulink.co.uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or 
colleagues]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DGrBv0.KGq@cix.compulink.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cix.compulink.co.uk!usenet

References: <xanthian-1210951029480001@kdolan-mac.qualcomm.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cix.compulink.co.uk!usenet
From: mark_tbu@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Mark Morgan Lloyd ")
Subject: Re: Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++)
Message-ID: <DGrBv0.KGq@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Organization: KDG Mobrey Telemetry
References: <xanthian-1210951029480001@kdolan-mac.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 17:13:48 GMT
X-News-Software: Ameol

Reply to Parent Message