Re: Modula-2 Compiler

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #3169

#3169

From: J.Last
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 11:43

11 lines
1242 bytes

Here in my department (Electronic Engineering) we use the StonyBrook QuickMod
compiler, which is not much cop to say the least. Perhaps the StonyBrook
Professional is better? This compiler does come with an excellent programming
environment, which makes the poor quality of the compiler a shame.

-- 
  _________    _______________________________    _________
 < ""/_\"" \  /                               \  / ""/_\"" >
 <  (.o.)   \/            Jake Last            \/   (.o.)  >
 <   v~v    /\   J.Last-93@student.lut.ac.uk   /\    v~v   >
 <_________/  \_______________________________/  \_________>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DLMtw2.41J@lut.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lut.ac.uk!usenet

References: <4e0thk$2jke@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <DLLyr6.1sC@cix.compulink.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lut.ac.uk!usenet
From: "J.Last" <J.Last-93@student.lut.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Modula-2 Compiler
Sender: usenet@lut.ac.uk (Usenet-News)
Message-ID: <DLMtw2.41J@lut.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 11:43:14 GMT
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: commserve1.lut.ac.uk
X-Url: news:DLLyr6.1sC@cix.compulink.co.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <4e0thk$2jke@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <DLLyr6.1sC@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4m)
Organization: Loughborough University of Technology, UK

Reply to Parent Message