Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #3205Re: Modula-2 Compiler
From: Peter Hertel
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 09:23
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 09:23
11 lines
1194 bytes
1194 bytes
I tried all of them and learned to like the Stony Brook professional development system. It produces the smallest and fastest code if properly tuned. It sticks to the rules as much as possible with DOS. N Now I am waiting for a 32bit version for Windows95. Will there be one? J.Last wrote: > > Here in my department (Electronic Engineering) we use the StonyBrook QuickMod > compiler, which is not much cop to say the least. Perhaps the StonyBrook > Professional is better? This compiler does come with an excellent programming > environment, which makes the poor quality of the compiler a shame.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<310C9215.17E@physik.uni-osnabrueck.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!deimos.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de!lindiReferences:
<4e0thk$2jke@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <DLLyr6.1sC@cix.compulink.co.uk> <DLMtw2.41J@lut.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!deimos.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de!lindi From: Peter Hertel <peter.hertel@physik.uni-osnabrueck.de> Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: Modula-2 Compiler Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 10:23:33 +0100 Organization: Universitaet Osnabrueck Message-ID: <310C9215.17E@physik.uni-osnabrueck.de> References: <4e0thk$2jke@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <DLLyr6.1sC@cix.compulink.co.uk> <DLMtw2.41J@lut.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: phe.physik.uni-osnabrueck.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I)