Re: Modula2 for C programmers?

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #3210

#3210

From: "Mark Morgan Lloyd "
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 18:29

12 lines
819 bytes

> I remain convinced that BITSET should have been defined in
> SYSTEM, so that it was clearly labelled as non-portable.

Yes. I've got a low-level module beneath my microkernel that redefines 
sets of common sizes (i.e. 8- and 16-bits) in terms of enumerations, that 
keeps the code nicely portable between FTL and JPI.

Mark Morgan Lloyd
mark_tbu@cix.compulink.co.uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or 
colleagues]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DM0BCw.JFD@cix.compulink.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cix.compulink.co.uk!usenet

References: <4eh2d6$18d@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cix.compulink.co.uk!usenet
From: mark_tbu@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Mark Morgan Lloyd ")
Subject: Re: Modula2 for C programmers?
Message-ID: <DM0BCw.JFD@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Organization: KDG Mobrey Telemetry
References: <4eh2d6$18d@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 18:29:20 GMT
X-News-Software: Ameol

Reply to Parent Message