Re: Redundant import

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #3765

#3765

From: Alan Lovejoy
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1987 14:26

11 lines
1101 bytes

In article <802@newton.physics.purdue.edu> hal@newton.physics.purdue.edu.UUCP writes:
>It is not necessary to repeat the imports in the implementation module
>since the all declarations of the definition module are automatically
>known to the implementation module.  The implementation module only

That depends on your compiler.  Some actually require the imports to
occur in both the definition and implementation modules.

I tend to agree with you that this is rather silly, however.

Alan "Don't you have to have a license to IMPORT?" Lovejoy

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1096@pdn.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!mtune!codas!usfvax2!pdn!alan

References: <802@newton.physics.purdue.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!mtune!codas!usfvax2!pdn!alan
From: alan@pdn.UUCP (Alan Lovejoy)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: Redundant import
Message-ID: <1096@pdn.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 21-Aug-87 10:26:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: pdn.1096
Posted: Fri Aug 21 10:26:36 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 23-Aug-87 04:10:56 EDT
References: <802@newton.physics.purdue.edu>
Reply-To: alan@pdn.UUCP (0000-Alan Lovejoy)
Organization: Paradyne Corporation, Largo, Florida
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message