Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #3916Re: Sets.
From: schaub
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1987 18:35
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1987 18:35
12 lines
1085 bytes
1085 bytes
In article <921@pur-phy>, hal@pur-phy (Hal Chambers) writes:
> This is what I have been saying ever since the day I first encountered
> Modula-2. Since BITSET is explicitly machine dependent it should be
> part of the pseudo-module SYSTEM and NOT the default type for sets.
> Hal Chambers
That's exactly why we decided to put it into SYSTEM in M2Amiga.
--
//
// Markus Schaub
\\ // uunet!nuchat!sugar!schaub
\X/ (713) 523 8422
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<957@sugar.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ptsfa!ames!elroy!cit-vax!oberon!bloom-beacon!husc6!bbn!rochester!udel!gatech!ukma!uunet!nuchat!sugar!schaubReferences:
<INFO-M2%87102620254979@UCF1VM> <921@pur-phy>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ptsfa!ames!elroy!cit-vax!oberon!bloom-beacon!husc6!bbn!rochester!udel!gatech!ukma!uunet!nuchat!sugar!schaub From: schaub@sugar.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: Sets. Message-ID: <957@sugar.UUCP> Date: Sat, 31-Oct-87 13:35:00 EST Article-I.D.: sugar.957 Posted: Sat Oct 31 13:35:00 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 4-Nov-87 19:54:05 EST References: <INFO-M2%87102620254979@UCF1VM> <921@pur-phy> Organization: Sugar Land UNIX - Houston, TX Lines: 12 Summary: BITSET in SYSTEM, see M2Amiga