Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #4058Re: Modula2 on Encore (questions)
From: Markus Schaub
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1988 16:55
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1988 16:55
16 lines
1334 bytes
1334 bytes
In article <2562@encore.UUCP>, soper@encore.UUCP (Pete Soper) writes:
> source code for next to nothing. The compiler produces horrible native code
> in no time flat. For example, the compiler recompiles itself on a Multimax 120
> (slowest Multimax model) in 45 seconds. Runtime performance is about 1/4 as
> good as that of equivalent C programs compiled with Encore C, based on the
> Hennessey/Nye benchmarks. There was a plan to have proper user documentation
We are working with the MC68000 version of ETH's compiler and are pleased with
the code generated. What processor does an Encore have? Do you know any reasons
for this poor performance?
--
// Markus Schaub uunet!nuchat!sugar!schaub (713) 523 8422
// M2Amiga Developer trying to get back the money I paid for my
\\ // Amiga by selling a few M2Amiga.
\X/ c/o Interface Technologies Corp, 3336 Richmond #323, Houston Tx 77098
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1454@sugar.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!nuchat!uhnix1!sugar!schaubReferences:
<8026@sunybcs.UUCP> <2562@encore.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!nuchat!uhnix1!sugar!schaub From: schaub@sugar.UUCP (Markus Schaub) Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: Modula2 on Encore (questions) Message-ID: <1454@sugar.UUCP> Date: 15 Feb 88 16:55:53 GMT References: <8026@sunybcs.UUCP> <2562@encore.UUCP> Organization: Sugar Land UNIX - Houston, TX Lines: 16