Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #4108Re: (none)
From: "S. Weber"
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 1988 05:00
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 1988 05:00
22 lines
1494 bytes
1494 bytes
In article <8802102345.AA05537@qusunc.qucis.uucp> you write:
>
>I am doing a comparative study on the design issues of Modula-2 vs. Turing +.
I am currently studing the design of programming languages, and would be
interested in seeing the results of your study. Would it be possible
for me to get a copy of your finished paper? Thank you.
Also, I was wondering why you chose to compare Turing Plus with Modula-2.
It would seem to me more natural to compare Turing with Modula-2, or
Turing Plus with Modula-2+, since the main features of both Turing Plus
and Modula-2+ over their mundane counterparts are the additions of
concurrency and exception handling. It just appears to me that you would
have a broader base of comparison if you chose languages which did not
have widely different features. Oh well, none of my business, I suppose.
--
-Sam Weber
UUCP: {ihnp4 utzoo decwrl uw-beaver}!utcsri!sam
ARPA: sam@csri.toronto.edu
CSNET: sam@toronto
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8803090500.AA08160@csri.toronto.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!csri.toronto.EDU!samReferences:
<8802102345.AA05537@qusunc.qucis.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!csri.toronto.EDU!sam
From: sam@csri.toronto.EDU ("S. Weber")
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: (none)
Message-ID: <8803090500.AA08160@csri.toronto.edu>
Date: 9 Mar 88 05:00:42 GMT
References: <8802102345.AA05537@qusunc.qucis.uucp>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: Info-Modula2 Distribution List <INFO-M2%UCF1VM.bitnet@jade.berkeley.edu>
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Lines: 21