Re: A Modula-2 Gripe

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #4420

#4420

From: John B. Nagle
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 1988 02:44

12 lines
908 bytes

     With JPI Modula-2, file I/O capabilities are comparable to, say,
older Lattice C systems.  All the basics are there.

     I/O in Pascal was ill-designed.  I/O in Modula I was absent.
I/O in Modula 2 is marginally adequate.  Solving the fundamental
conflict between strong typing and I/O remains difficult.  The
solution in Ada is in some ways better, but requries the massive
machinery of generics.  It may get better in the object-oriented
programming era.  Is it better in Oberon?

					John Nagle

Technical Details

Message-ID: <17666@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!glacier!jbn

References: <3881@tekgvs.GVS.TEK.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!glacier!jbn
From: jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: A Modula-2 Gripe
Message-ID: <17666@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>
Date: 31 Aug 88 02:44:48 GMT
References: <3881@tekgvs.GVS.TEK.COM>
Reply-To: jbn@glacier.UUCP (John B. Nagle)
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message