Re: comp.lang.modula2

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #4704

#4704

From: Alan Lovejoy
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1989 17:36

16 lines
1149 bytes

In article <331@trwrc.UUCP> agnew@trwrc.UUCP (Robert A. Agnew) writes:
>	I suggest that every MODULA II compiler writer out there totally
>disregard the flagrant insanities in the 4th edition!

It should be interesting to compare the language defined by the
international standardization effort with that defined by PIM2v4.

Could it be that a committee will produce a product superior to that
of the great language designer himself?

-- 
Alan Lovejoy; alan@pdn; 813-530-2211; ATT-Paradyne: 8550 Ulmerton, Largo, FL.
Disclaimer: I do not speak for ATT-Paradyne.  They do not speak for me. 
___________ This Month's Slogan: Reach out and BUY someone (tm). ___________
Motto: If nanomachines will be able to reconstruct you, YOU AREN'T DEAD YET.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5751@pdn.nm.paradyne.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!pdn!alan

References: <331@trwrc.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!pdn!alan
From: alan@pdn.nm.paradyne.com (Alan Lovejoy)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: comp.lang.modula2
Keywords: Wirth New edition
Message-ID: <5751@pdn.nm.paradyne.com>
Date: 10 Mar 89 17:36:49 GMT
References: <331@trwrc.UUCP>
Reply-To: alan@pdn.nm.paradyne.com (0000-Alan Lovejoy)
Organization: AT&T Paradyne, Largo, Florida
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message