Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #5032Re: Structural Type Equivalence in Modula-3: Why?
From: Preston Briggs
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 1990 17:20
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 1990 17:20
15 lines
991 bytes
991 bytes
In article <3508@caesar.cs.montana.edu> icsu8209@caesar.cs.montana.edu (Glassy) writes: >Page 2, Sect. 2, Par. 1 Line 1 of "Modula-3 Report (revised)" by >Cardelli, Donahue et al indicates Modula-3 uses structural type >equivalence, instead of name type equivalence used in Modula-2. Besides Chase's comments in another article, there's a paper expanding on some of the rationale The Modula-3 type system Cardelli, Donahue, Jordan, Kalsow, Nelson POPL 16, 1989 -- Preston Briggs looking for the great leap forward preston@titan.rice.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5734@brazos.Rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rice!titan!prestonReferences:
<3508@caesar.cs.montana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rice!titan!preston From: preston@titan.rice.edu (Preston Briggs) Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: Structural Type Equivalence in Modula-3: Why? Message-ID: <5734@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 13 Mar 90 17:20:47 GMT References: <3508@caesar.cs.montana.edu> Sender: root@rice.edu Distribution: usa Organization: Rice University, Houston Lines: 15