🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug20.135259.25916@informatik.uni-bremen.de>, ms@lehre11.informatik.Uni-Bremen.DE (Martin Schroeder) writes:
> Does anybody have experience using the GMD-toolbox for compiler construction?
> I want to use it, but here at the university the folks who have used it have
> warned me against it. Any comments?
> ...
Hallo!

  In Ulm, we use it to modify the mtc from the GMD. It is very good, flexible
all what we (you) want.
  To do this, I portate the whole ToolBox to a VAX under VMS.

  To measure the quality of the ToolBox, it is a good thing to tell about the
difficulties we had to portate it. This was minor!
  The tables of the parsers have sun-format and after the transfer with the DNI-
Software I only need a little C-Programm (20 lines) to convert it to VAX-
format. The next time the parser and the scanner create themself their own
new table in VAX-format.
  There were also a lot of minor changes within the Modula-2-sources because
your compiler (from ModulaWare) is "stronger" as the Mocka-Compiler.

bye

guy maurel