Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #588Re: Is Modula-2 dead?
From: Harm Munk
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 11:20
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 11:20
46 lines
2981 bytes
2981 bytes
tchannon@black.demon.co.uk (Tim Channon) writes:
>>Today Modula-2 to me seems to be dying: Vendors are vanishing and most of the
>>world (i.e. the Intel-World) is using C++. And in 18 months we will have a
>>wonderful standard, but nobody will care ("Modula-2? We are using C++").
>>So what is the presence and the future of Modula-2? And who ist really using
>>Modula-2 (no universities please, just the real world)?
>A new shareware comms program (Deputy) for the IBM PC compatible was released
>this month. The extant Odyessey comms program is also written largely in M2.
>Both are very good but alas I did hear one grumble 'I won't use it because
>it's written in Pascal-like'!!! (if it's written in C _I_ look for the weak
>typing bugs 8-)
>Ok, so the above is not the real world. Hearsay is that there are moves from
>Ada to Modula2 by major players but nailing names is not easy. People seem
>very guarded in their admission, me included.
>If asked I tend to be guarded if someone asks what language was used to code
>a program. With a lot of my stuff that would be answered 'Assembler and
>Forth', perhaps leaving out mention of the latter or just saying 'running
>under Forth'. Commercially Forth is often not acceptable, and unfortunately
>Modula2 can suffer a little in the same way.
>Prejudice!
> TC.
> E-mail: tchannon@black.demon.co.uk or tchannon@cix.compulink.co.uk
>
If people think that real programs should be written in C or C++, then let's
stop developing native Modula 2 compilers. Instead, we should have compilers
that compile to C or C++. If we do that, we use C (and C++ ?) for the purpose
that it was developed for: glorified assembly ;-).
And if asked in which language our products are written, we can say that the
code is in C or C++.
+----------------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Harm Munk | Building WAY 11 |
| Philips Research Laboratories | P.O. Box 80 000 |
| Knowledge Based Systems | 5600 JA Eindhoven |
| | The Netherlands |
| #include <standard.disclaimer> | tel. +31 40 74 46 59 |
| | email: munk@prl.philips.nl |
+----------------------------------------+------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<munk.714828002@prles6b>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!relay.philips.nl!prle!prles6b!munkReferences:
<1992Aug20.134358.25702@informatik.uni-bremen.de> <714374380snx@black.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!relay.philips.nl!prle!prles6b!munk From: munk@prl.philips.nl (Harm Munk) Subject: Re: Is Modula-2 dead? Message-ID: <munk.714828002@prles6b> Sender: news@prl.philips.nl (USENET News System) Organization: Philips Research Laboratories Eindhoven, Netherlands References: <1992Aug20.134358.25702@informatik.uni-bremen.de> <714374380snx@black.demon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 11:20:02 GMT Lines: 46