🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <18202@rpp386.cactus.org> aubrey@rpp386.UUCP (Aubrey McIntosh) writes:
>I've just read Oberon's announcement in SP&E, and it seems that
>one can craft programs that are correct in both languages.  I.e., there
>is much more similarity between M2 and Oberon than, say, M2 and Pascal.
>
>Has anyone tried this?  Does anyone outside Wirth's group have an
>Oberon system?
>-- 
>Aubrey McIntosh  	"Find hungry samurai." -- The Old Man        
>1502 Devon Circle       comp.os.minix, comp.lang.modula2         
>Austin, TX 78723 
>1-(512)-452-1540  (v)

In the original Oberon report you can almost do this. One problem is in the
module headings. For Modula-2 we have:

DEFINITION MODULE foo;

for Oberon we have

DEFINITION foo;

so trying to pass off an Oberon module to a Modula-2 compiler doesn't work.
Otherwise, one would mostly be writing Oberon while avoiding use of the new
features of Oberon (e.g., type extension).

The intersection of Modula-2 and Oberon produces a language that is indeed
small, but perhaps not very useful.


-- 
Chuck Lins               | "Exit left to funway."
Apple Computer, Inc.     | Internet: lins@apple.com
20525 Mariani Avenue     | AppleLink: LINS
Mail Stop 41-K           | 
Cupertino, CA 95014      | "Self-proclaimed Object Oberon Evangelist"
The intersection of Apple's ideas and my ideas yields the empty set.