Re: FOR loops

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #888

#888

From: Michael Franz
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 1990 16:13

4 lines
637 bytes

It is probably worthwile to note that the FOR construct is completely
absent from Oberon.  I for one haven't missed it yet.

Michael Franz   Computersysteme   ETH Zurich   Switzerland.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4998@ethz.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!cernvax!chx400!ethz!mfranz

References: <INFO-M2%90070316593556@UCF1VM.BITNET> <18442@rpp386.cactus.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!cernvax!chx400!ethz!mfranz
From: mfranz@ethz.UUCP (Michael Franz)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: FOR loops
Message-ID: <4998@ethz.UUCP>
Date: 5 Jul 90 16:13:44 GMT
References: <INFO-M2%90070316593556@UCF1VM.BITNET> <18442@rpp386.cactus.org>
Reply-To: mfranz@bernina.ethz.ch.UUCP (Michael Franz)
Organization: ETH Zuerich, Switzerland
Lines: 4

Reply to Parent Message