Re: TopSpeed Modula-2 V2.00 not quite that bad?

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #899

#899

From: Randy Bush
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 1990 15:27

7 lines
740 bytes

In <75055@cc.utah.edu> RCAPENER@cc.utah.edu writes:
> I delight in pulling the tiger's tail 8^))).

But it pays to do so with some foreknowledge.  The JPI compilers under
discussion are _all_ written in Modula-2.  I wonder why.
-- 
..!{uunet,qiclab,intelhf}!m2xenix!randy   randy@psg.com   randy@m2xenix.uucp

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Jul5.152716.11573@m2xenix.psg.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!nosun!qiclab!m2xenix!randy

References: <7734@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> <75055@cc.utah.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!nosun!qiclab!m2xenix!randy
From: randy@m2xenix.psg.com (Randy Bush)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: TopSpeed Modula-2 V2.00 not quite that bad?
Message-ID: <1990Jul5.152716.11573@m2xenix.psg.com>
Date: 5 Jul 90 15:27:16 GMT
References: <7734@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> <75055@cc.utah.edu>
Organization: Pacific Systems Group, Portland Oregon US
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message