Thread View: comp.lang.modula2
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Klaus Vossloh
Mon, 16 Nov 1987 13:07
Re: Good Modula Style
Author: Klaus Vossloh
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1987 13:07
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1987 13:07
84 lines
2196 bytes
2196 bytes
MODULE LAYOUT;
(*---------------------------------------------*)
(* We made good experiences with the following *)
(* layout in combination with *)
(* grouping related objects and algorithm. *)
(* The layout is not very compact but seems to*)
(* be readable. *)
(*---------------------------------------------*)
FROM PCIO IMPORT
Con, WriteString;
CONST
Co1 = 12;
Co2 = 17;
TYPE
Ty1 = (El1, El2);
Ty2 = (El3, El4);
VAR
Va1 : Ty1;
Va2 : Ty2;
PROCEDURE Pr1(Pa1 : Ty1; Pa2 : Ty2);
CONST
Co3 = 24;
Co4 = 37;
TYPE
Ty3 = (El5, El6);
Ty4 = (El7, El8);
VAR
Va3 : Ty3;
Va4 : Ty4;
PROCEDURE Pr2(Pa3 : Ty3; Pa4 : Ty4);
CONST
Co5 = 98;
Co6 = 45;
TYPE
Ty5 = (El9, El10);
Ty6 = (El11, El12);
VAR
Va5 : Ty5;
Va6 : Ty6;
Va7 : ARRAY [1..4711] OF REAL;
PROCEDURE Pr3(Pa5 : Ty5; Pa6 : Ty6);
VAR I, J : CARDINAL;
BEGIN (* Pr3 *)
FOR I:=1 TO 12 BY 2 DO
REPEAT
WHILE FALSE DO
IF TRUE THEN
J := I + 1
ELSIF NOT TRUE THEN
J := I - 1;
RETURN
ELSE
WriteString(Con, "Aha.$");
Va7[13] := 1.0
END (* If *)
END (* While *);
Pr1(Va1, Va2)
UNTIL TRUE
END (* For *)
END Pr3;
BEGIN (* Pr2 *)
END Pr2;
BEGIN (* Pr1 *)
END Pr1;
BEGIN (* LAYOUT *)
END LAYOUT.
Re: Good Modula Style
Author: Hal Chambers
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1987 12:22
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1987 12:22
29 lines
1611 bytes
1611 bytes
In article <INFO-M2%87111613494632@DB0TUI11> Info-Modula2 Distribution List <INFO-M2%UCF1VM.bitnet@jade.berkeley.edu> writes:
> IF TRUE THEN
> J := I + 1
> ELSIF NOT TRUE THEN
> J := I - 1;
.....
I would also recommend using semicolon as a statement terminator rather
than a separator. Modula-2 specifically allows the extra semicolon
so that this may be done.
IF TRUE THEN
J := I + 1;
ELSIF NOT TRUE THEN
J := I - 1;
.....
Although it isn't syntactically required, it results in a more uniform
appearance to the code. Also, if a substantial block of code follows
the IF and you latter add more statments to the block, it is easy to
miss the omitted semicolon when the J:=I+1 is no longer the last
statment of the block.
Admittedly this is a matter of style (read: personal preference) and
I do not claim that the form omitting the semicolon is in any sense
"ugly" or anything like that.
Hal Chambers
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads