Thread View: comp.lang.modula2
6 messages
6 total messages
Started by "Bjoern Asle VALDE 5 21 26 98", ...
Mon, 01 Feb 1988 17:43
(none)
Author: "Bjoern Asle VALDE 5 21 26 98", ...
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1988 17:43
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1988 17:43
17 lines
1196 bytes
1196 bytes
Hi. Does any1 out there know if it is possible to use any PC-based M2 compilers (Stony Brook?) when working under windows ? Or rather: has anybody any experience with using M2 to develop an substantial application running under MicroSoft (tm) Windows (tm) *without* using the Ms C compiler and the Ms Windows Developers Library - system ? The project I'm refering to will span over several years and will include several components (editors, translator, graphix etc). Pretty soon I'll be stuck with C, although I'm not all that excited when thinking about it... Any ideas are welcomme! Cheers; Bjoern Asle. FROM Standards IMPORT Disclaimer.
Re: (none)
Author: Kent Paul Dolan
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1988 05:11
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1988 05:11
23 lines
1475 bytes
1475 bytes
Bjoern,
If you are starting a multi-year project, I recommend in the
strongest terms dissociating yourself from the IBM-PC/Intel
architecture and Microsoft's products at the beginning.
I am currently programming in the OXXI Benchmark Modula-2
compiler, which has a beautifully integrated development
system using micro-gnu-emacs (you can edit, compile, link and
test without leaving emacs) with full, documented access to
the AmigaDOS multi-processing, message passing, window
oriented operating system. It is like being in love!
I'm sure that there are several other well integrated systems
out there, but I'm convinced none of them will ever come from
Microsoft or IBM, their records speak too strongly against it.
Good luck with your project, and keep us informed how it goes!
Thanks,
Kent, the man from xanth.
Re: Using Modula-2 under MS Windows
Author: Bruce Bergman
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1988 01:07
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1988 01:07
45 lines
2571 bytes
2571 bytes
In article <INFO-M2%88020117453023@DB0TUI11>, SINBV@NOBERGEN.BITNET ("Bjoern Asle VALDE 5 21 26 98", +47) writes:
> Does any1 out there know if it is possible to use any PC-based M2
> compilers (Stony Brook?) when working under windows ? Or rather:
> has anybody any experience with using M2 to develop an substantial
> application running under MicroSoft (tm) Windows (tm) *without*
> using the Ms C compiler and the Ms Windows Developers Library - system ?
>
> Cheers; Bjoern Asle.
Yes, it is possible. I have an 11,000 application for the PC written
(originally) for Logitech, however ported over to Stony Brook. I was
one of the Beta-testers for Stony Brook Modula-2 and three hours after
I received my beta test copy, I was hooked!
The application was a little too large for me to want to place it
completely under Windows, so I shrunk it to about 2500 lines and used
THAT under windows. Originally there were some bugs (like it refused
to clean up the screen correctly), however they've been fixed (or so
I've been told by the developer -- I haven't tried it again).
Eventually, I decided to keep my old interface instead of the MSW
version, which is why I haven't tried it since. I doubt I'll go back
to that version -- it really was only a play toy.
The 11,000 application is now nicely running on my PC, having been
recompiled in less than a quarter of the time Logitech took, and an
amazing 30k smaller (even smaller than Logitech 2/86 v3.0). Needless
to say, I'm very much a fan of Stony Brook...
Absolute vital statistics (Logitech vs Stony Brook) are available if
there is enough interest. I won't bother getting them if there isn't
a large enough crowd.
BTW, is anyone else out there using Stony Brook??
bruce bergman
--
allegra!\ TeleSoft, Inc.
ihnp4! \ crash!--\ (619) 457-2700 x123
nosc! \ \
>--sdcsvax!---->--telesoft!bruceb (Bruce Bergman N7HAW)
scgvaxd! / /
ucbvax! / log-hb!--/ 5959 Cornerstone Court West
uunet! / San Diego, CA. 92121-9891
Any opinions are my own. Make Wildfire a Thing of the Past.
Re: (none)
Author: Kent Paul Dolan
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1988 06:27
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1988 06:27
10 lines
769 bytes
769 bytes
Modula-2 group readers: Sorry to the net my slam of Microsoft and the IBM-PC went out public; these words thoroughly represented my opinions, but were supposed to be a private email; not something for you to wade through. I hit the wrong key in rn and didn't notice until the next day. Again, my apologies. Kent, the man from xanth.
Stony Brook Modula-2/ Re: Using Modula-2 under MS Windows
Author: Uday Kurkure
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1988 18:33
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1988 18:33
16 lines
918 bytes
918 bytes
In article <185@telesoft.UUCP>, bruceb@telesoft.UUCP (Bruce Bergman @spot) writes:
> Absolute vital statistics (Logitech vs Stony Brook) are available if
> there is enough interest. I won't bother getting them if there isn't
> a large enough crowd.
>
> BTW, is anyone else out there using Stony Brook??
Does Stony Brook Modula-2 system come with a run-time debugger?
And how much does the full system cost?
Please post the vital statistics.
Thanks,
..uday
Re: (none)
Author: papowell
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1988 19:51
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1988 19:51
6 lines
694 bytes
694 bytes
Ahh Ha! I have been trying to find somebody who has had experience wiht this. 1. Where can I get information/source for the "micro/gnu/emacs" 2. How about using this on other systems? Patrick Powell
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads