Article View: comp.lang.oberon
Article #1193Re: A question of languages
From: are
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 09:03
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 09:03
14 lines
1224 bytes
1224 bytes
Peter Froehlich writes: > Regarding GC: The point here is that Oberon-2 is advocated as a >"general purpose language". But think about real-time systems where one >usually can't guarantee response times when working with a GC (okay, one >probably will not even use NEW() in such a project either). Ok, in all Oberon systems that i have seen, the GC isn't a very sophisticated one. But there are nowadays even real-time GC Implemetations available. And look for example at the Elang Language and its implementaion by Ericsson. They use it for writing telephony software. So GC and functional languages have gone a long way. Surely would it be possible to incorporate a real-time GC in OBeron. Andreas Eder
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ARE.96Mar25100328@laphroig.mch.sni.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!luxor.mch.sni.de!luxor!areReferences:
<9603150859.AA03757@olympe> <224939A9H000EA602H@p.froehlich.amc.cube.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!luxor.mch.sni.de!luxor!are From: are@laphroig.mch.sni.de Newsgroups: comp.lang.oberon Subject: Re: A question of languages Date: 25 Mar 1996 09:03:22 GMT Organization: Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme AG Message-ID: <ARE.96Mar25100328@laphroig.mch.sni.de> References: <9603150859.AA03757@olympe> <224939A9H000EA602H@p.froehlich.amc.cube.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: laphroig.mch.sni.de In-reply-to: p.froehlich@amc.cube.net's message of Sun, 24 Mar 1996 16:30:33 +0100