Re: The Trouble with WITH...

Article View: comp.lang.oberon

Article #1256

#1256

From: M Hamburg
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 1996 16:57

9 lines
904 bytes

Another solution is to say that WITH p: T introduces a new variable named
p within the scope of the WITH statement that is distinct from the
variable of the same name in the containing scope. The variable created
within the WITH cannot be assigned to. Since assigning to a WITH'd
variable is generally bad form anyway, this definition doesn't cause a
problem for "well formed" programs, and it is safe for "ill formed"
programs.

Mark

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4jrm9b$l8m@newsbf02.news.aol.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail

References: <2251891AH0002BF21H@p.froehlich.amc.cube.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsbf02.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
From: mhamburg@aol.com (M Hamburg)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.oberon
Subject: Re: The Trouble with WITH...
Date: 2 Apr 1996 11:57:15 -0500
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
Message-ID: <4jrm9b$l8m@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
References: <2251891AH0002BF21H@p.froehlich.amc.cube.net>
Reply-To: mhamburg@aol.com (M Hamburg)
NNTP-Posting-Host: newsbf02.mail.aol.com

Reply to Parent Message