Re: Is "POINTER TO ARRAY OF Object" legal?

Article View: comp.lang.oberon

Article #1282

#1282

From: hartmut Goebel
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 14:52

17 lines
1017 bytes

skulski (skulski@fermi.nsrl.rochester.edu) schrieb:

 > I was told that some older implementations of GC had problems with
 >this.

So why dont' you just believe it? If you don't trust informations from
experts, read

Cuno Pfister (ed.), et al: Oberon Technical Notes.
Department Informatik, ETH Zürich, Report No. 156, 1991

 >Wojtek

+++hartmut

| hartmut Goebel      | hartmut@oberon.nbg.sub.org   //  |
| Compiler Manufactur | Essich@irc                 \X/   |

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1779958@oberon.nbg.sub.org>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!oberon.nbg.sub.org!not-for-mail

References: <1996Apr1.191755.1@fermi.nsrl.rochester.edu> <3183BF9F.13D9@iis.nsk.su> <1996Apr3.140147.1@fermi.nsrl.rochester.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!oberon.nbg.sub.org!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.oberon
References: <1996Apr1.191755.1@fermi.nsrl.rochester.edu> <3183BF9F.13D9@iis.nsk.su> <1996Apr3.140147.1@fermi.nsrl.rochester.edu>
From: "hartmut Goebel" <hartmut@oberon.nbg.sub.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 15:52:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-NewsReader: IntuiNews 1.3b Beta 12 (23.3.96)
Subject: Re: Is "POINTER TO ARRAY OF Object" legal?
Message-ID: <1779958@oberon.nbg.sub.org>

Reply to Parent Message