🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1779958@oberon.nbg.sub.org>, 
"hartmut Goebel" <hartmut@oberon.nbg.sub.org> writes:
> skulski (skulski@fermi.nsrl.rochester.edu) schrieb:
> 
>  > I was told that some older implementations of GC had problems with
>  >this.
> 
> So why dont' you just believe it? If you don't trust informations from
> experts, read

Definitely I do believe. The point of my question was to clarify, 
if POINTER TO ARRAY OF POINTER was good legal _language_, or not?
If it was OK, then we can still have some implementations which 
are not up to the standard, but this is another matter.

> 
> Cuno Pfister (ed.), et al: Oberon Technical Notes.
> Department Informatik, ETH Zürich, Report No. 156, 1991

Thank you for the info. 

Wojtek