Re: Oberon/F: Returning extended types.

Article View: comp.lang.oberon

Article #780

#780

From: M. Gallo
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 1996 09:19

13 lines
858 bytes

In article <4cit6v$qmv@rc1.vub.ac.be>,
JENKINS BART MBA <bjenkin@vub.ac.be> wrote:
>All,
>  Does Oberon/F restrict one to ONLY returning a BASIC type 
>(REAL, INTEGER,... etc)
>or is there a way to return a RECORD type without using a pointer.  Example:

The original definition of the Oberon language forbids records and arrays 
from being return types.  I assume Oberon/F has not extended the language 
in this way.

-- 
God is in the details. -- Ludwig Mies van der Rohe (1959)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4co375$hed@twizzler.callamer.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!twizzler.callamer.com!mgallo

References: <4cit6v$qmv@rc1.vub.ac.be>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!twizzler.callamer.com!mgallo
From: mgallo@slonet.org (M. Gallo)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.oberon
Subject: Re: Oberon/F: Returning extended types.
Date: 7 Jan 1996 09:19:33 GMT
Organization: SLONET Regional Information Access
Message-ID: <4co375$hed@twizzler.callamer.com>
References: <4cit6v$qmv@rc1.vub.ac.be>
NNTP-Posting-Host: biggulp.callamer.com

Reply to Parent Message