Re[2]: is there a OP2 for 68000 non FPU? (Article 5316 in comp.lang.oberon)

Article View: comp.lang.oberon

Article #783

#783

From: "Jim Hawkins"
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 21:24

13 lines
791 bytes

>
>P.S: It would be nice for me to see someone else using Oberon-A,
>     because I've got a problem with some oberon-source that to
>     me looks perfectly innocent - just some declarations and
>     variable initialisations, yet the compiler reports errors.
>
>lerchj@sunserver1.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de /

I use Oberon-A extensively. Email me some source and I'll see if I
can locate the problem.


 -- Jim Hawkins

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DL1Csz.A8q@cix.compulink.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cix.compulink.co.uk!usenet

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.lang.oberon
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cix.compulink.co.uk!usenet
From: jhawkins@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Jim Hawkins")
Subject: Re[2]: is there a OP2 for 68000 non FPU? (Article 5316 in comp.lang.oberon)
Message-ID: <DL1Csz.A8q@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Organization: Cosy CIX User
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 21:24:34 GMT
X-News-Software: Lucy 43.2 (02.07.95) [beta]