🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <60377@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>, summers@acsu.buffalo.edu (Michael Summers) writes:
|> Why would I want to use Objective C ? Can any one give me a
|> short description of the pros and cons of the two
|> languages?
|> 
|> There is a lot of support for C++ in terms of PD software
|> and vendors but hardly any for Objective C.

Things seem to change as I read an announcement of IBM in the Feb 91 version of the UNIX magazine:
"Objective-C instead of C++". They are supporting Objective-C on their IBM RISC System/6000
Technology.

In addition, we should also consider all the owners of NeXT machines. Although they have the choice
between C++ and Objective-C, the greater support for a user interface (NextStep) is provided only
for Objective-C.

|> What is so superior about Objective C that would
|> induce me to abandon this support?

You can handle real Objects (in the sense of Smalltalk). E.g. you can write a container (e.g. a
array) that can contain **any** object **and** that provides functionality like "send a message
to each object contained on behalf of a user.

Thomas Oeser


****** DISCLAIMER: All opinions stated here are strictly my own *********
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet:	thomas%apgraph%ap542@ztivax.siemens.com
Europe:		thomas%apgraph@ap542.UUCP
Phone:		+ 49 89 636 47537
Fax:		+ 49 89 636 45522
Postal Mail:	Siemens Nixdorf Information Systems AG, AP 153,
                Carl-Wery-Str. 22, D-8000 Munich 83, West Germany
-------------------------------------------------------------------------