🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug18.123634.5905@news.th-darmstadt.de> uli@aida.intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Ulrich Grepel) writes:

   In article <41299@skye.dcs.ed.ac.uk>, gvw@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Greg Wilson) writes:
   |> Apologies if this is a FAQ, but I am looking for a PD implementation of
   |> Objective-C, and accompanying documentation (i.e. language description
   |> with tutorials).

   I would suggest looking at GNU and it's gcc version 2.2.x. There's an Objective-C
   compiler in it, and GNU is (kind of) PD. With the tutorials, it is quite different...

   Uli

yes, and it is totally useless until someone writes the runtime
message dispatching routines.  basically, it doesn't have an Object
class.

what's "kind of PD" supposed to mean?  PD, assuming that the original
poster was referring to public domain, is a legal term.  either
something is or is not public domain.  you can't be "kind of" public
domain.  GNU stuff is freely distributable.  you just can't claim you
wrote it.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Gradual Student/Systems Guy  Department of Computer Science
Internet:   khera@cs.duke.edu             Box 90129
            (MIME mail accepted)          Durham, NC 27708-0129 (919)660-6528