Article View: comp.lang.objective-c
Article #263How's Stepstone/Objective-C doing?
From: Karl Lehenbauer
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1991 16:52
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1991 16:52
14 lines
1065 bytes
1065 bytes
I'm interested in Objective-C, but I'm wondering about it. Relative volumes in the C++ and Objective-C groups shows C++ is getting a lot more attention on the net; likewise, there are multiple C++ implementations for DOS, none for O-C that I know of (using DOS as a barometer). The questions are, are there Objective-C vendors other than Stepstone? Are there forthcoming affordable implementations for "standard" architectures, no matter how offensive those architectures may be? Does anyone have a feel for how Stepstone themselves are doing, i.e. will they still be around a year or two, five years, from now? -- -- uunet!sugar!karl Keeping 255 messages and deleting 158. --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Mar30.165230.11364@sugar.hackercorp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sugar!karlShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sugar!karl From: karl@sugar.hackercorp.com (Karl Lehenbauer) Newsgroups: comp.lang.objective-c Subject: How's Stepstone/Objective-C doing? Message-ID: <1991Mar30.165230.11364@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 30 Mar 91 16:52:30 GMT Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX Lines: 14