🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.objective-c
Article #263

How's Stepstone/Objective-C doing?

#263
From: Karl Lehenbauer
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1991 16:52
14 lines
1065 bytes
I'm interested in Objective-C, but I'm wondering about it.  Relative volumes
in the C++ and Objective-C groups shows C++ is getting a lot more attention
on the net; likewise, there are multiple C++ implementations for DOS, none
for O-C that I know of (using DOS as a barometer).

The questions are, are there Objective-C vendors other than Stepstone?
Are there forthcoming affordable implementations for "standard" 
architectures, no matter how offensive those architectures may be?  Does
anyone have a feel for how Stepstone themselves are doing, i.e. will they
still be around a year or two, five years, from now?

-- 
-- uunet!sugar!karl		Keeping 255 messages and deleting 158.
-- 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991Mar30.165230.11364@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sugar!karl

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sugar!karl
From: karl@sugar.hackercorp.com (Karl Lehenbauer)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.objective-c
Subject: How's Stepstone/Objective-C doing?
Message-ID: <1991Mar30.165230.11364@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 30 Mar 91 16:52:30 GMT
Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX
Lines: 14