Re: How's Stepstone/Objective-C doing?

Article View: comp.lang.objective-c

Article #267

Back to comp.lang.objective-c Previous Next

#267

From: Paul Kunz
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 1991 04:39

11 lines
1278 bytes

   Just for the record, there's also an implementation of Objective-C 
for the Amiga.   It was done by someone at Calstate-Sacramento who's
name escapes me at the moment.
   Also the NextStep 2.0 version of the Objective-C compiler allows use
of C++ within an Objective-C object, perhaps making it an Objective-C++
compiler.   So you don't have to choose between Obj-C and C++, one
compiler does both.   Use the right tool for the right job, sometimes
Objective-C is best, sometimes its C++.   With the compiler on the NeXT
you have your choice.   I think this will be released as the GNU 2.0
gcc compiler, but I'm not sure.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <PFKEB.91Apr1203950@ebnextk.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!pfkeb

References: <1991Mar30.165230.11364@sugar.hackercorp.com> <6737@stpstn.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!pfkeb
From: pfkeb@ebnextk.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Paul Kunz)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.objective-c
Subject: Re: How's Stepstone/Objective-C doing?
Message-ID: <PFKEB.91Apr1203950@ebnextk.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 2 Apr 91 04:39:50 GMT
References: <1991Mar30.165230.11364@sugar.hackercorp.com> <6737@stpstn.UUCP>
Sender: news@unixhub.SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Lines: 11
Nntp-Posting-Host: ebnextk.slac.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: cox@stpstn.UUCP's message of 1 Apr 91 17:12:45 GMT

Reply to Parent Message