Article View: comp.lang.objective-c
Article #342Re: health of Stepstone and ObjC
From: John Rogers
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1991 02:57
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1991 02:57
44 lines
2979 bytes
2979 bytes
In article <1991May31.065729.26949@csun.edu> mrs@ms.secs.csun.edu (Mike Stump) writes:
>In article <1991May23.075820.983@agate.berkeley.edu> izumi@mindseye.berkeley.edu (Izumi Ohzawa) writes:
>>In article <1991May23.031433.11017@netcom.COM>
>> rkitts@netcom.COM (Rick Kitts) writes:
>>>In article <2058@camex.COM> geoff@circus.camex.com (Geoffrey Knauth) writes:
>
>>>> I've been hearing ugly rumors that [...] Stepstone [...]
>>>> [is] in trouble. Someone please tell me this is disinformation.
>>>
>>> I spoke with the president of Stepstone today regarding Stepstones
>>> financial situation. I was told by the person who answered the
>>> phone (not the pres) that SS was undergoing a ``reorganization''
>>> and that ``very(?) few employees were left.''. [...]
>>
>> I am a bit confused.
>>
>> How critical is Stepstone's continued operation to NeXT and NeXT
>> users?
>>
>> What part of NeXT software is directly dependent on Stepstone?
>>
>> I am confused because I thought Objective-C compiler technology
>> is now/soon part of GNU compiler, which is free.
>
>I love free market economies. Simply put, Stepstone was pulling in to
>much money, not really providing the bang for the buck. NeXT knew
>this (or found it out) decided to cut cost, knew they could do better
>than to continue to give any more money to Stepstone. So they extened
>the GNU compiler (for which they don't have to give a red cent to
>anyone if they don't want to), and came up with a more cost effective
>solution for their needs. They relied on Stepstone in the past, now
>they are ``free'' (pardon the pun).
So, is there any public (electronic) access to that compiler (e.g. ftp
sites, postings to appropriate comp.sources.whatever, etc.)? I would
appreciate the response very much. Thanks, netters!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/// | The Blue Wizard (John Rogers)
/// Only Amiga | rogers@marge.math.binghamton.edu
\\\ /// gives you a | (Don't toucha my wand or I will breaka ya!)
\\\/// creative edge | #include <std.disclaimers>
\XX/ | cat flames >/dev/null
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jun7.025751.13132@newserve.cc.binghamton.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!sarah!newserve!carol!rogersReferences:
<1991May23.031433.11017@netcom.COM> <1991May23.075820.983@agate.berkeley.edu> <1991May31.065729.26949@csun.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.objective-c,comp.sys.next Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!sarah!newserve!carol!rogers From: rogers@carol.math.binghamton.edu (John Rogers) Subject: Re: health of Stepstone and ObjC Message-ID: <1991Jun7.025751.13132@newserve.cc.binghamton.edu> Summary: Is GNU Objective C compiler available? Keywords: GNU, compiler, ftp Sender: usenet@newserve.cc.binghamton.edu (Mr News) Nntp-Posting-Host: math-gw.cc.binghamton.edu Organization: The Blue Wizard's Lab at SUNY-Binghamton References: <1991May23.031433.11017@netcom.COM> <1991May23.075820.983@agate.berkeley.edu> <1991May31.065729.26949@csun.edu> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1991 02:57:51 GMT