Article View: comp.lang.objective-c
Article #49Re: Objective-C vs. C++
From: John F. Wiederhirn
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 15:44
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 15:44
17 lines
1397 bytes
1397 bytes
timm@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu (Tim McClarren) writes:
> andy@uh.msc.edu (Andrew Hollenbeck) writes:
> >C++ is certainly more popular, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it is
> >better. You can walk into any bookstore and find a couple dozen C++ books, but I
> >have yet to find a single Objective-C book in those stores.
>
> There aren't any decent Objective books...don't waste your money on
> the Weiner and Pinson book. It's terrible.
The seminal work by Brad Cox and Andrew Novobilski is quite good, IMO.
It's rather readable, and explains quite a bit about OOLs in general,
Objective-C in particular, and the Objective-C compiler framework in
detail.
--
==========================================================================
John Wiederhirn - Commodore Applications & Technical Support
{uunet,rutgers}!cbmvax!johnw johnw@cbmvax.commodore.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<34650@cbmvax.commodore.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!network.ucsd.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!johnwReferences:
<timm.714755187@void>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!network.ucsd.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!johnw From: johnw@bobcat.cbm.commodore.com (John F. Wiederhirn) Newsgroups: comp.lang.objective-c,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Objective-C vs. C++ Message-ID: <34650@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 26 Aug 92 15:44:36 GMT References: <timm.714755187@void> Sender: news@cbmvax.commodore.com Organization: Commodore Applications and Technical Support Lines: 17