🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.objective-c
Article #51

Re: Objective-C vs. C++

#51
From: Andy Newman
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 06:18
18 lines
1102 bytes
andy@uh.msc.edu (Andrew Hollenbeck) writes:
>I've used C++ and would like to know what distinguishes Objective-C from C++.
>The Objective-C FAQ (Q6/A6) only indicates features that C++ contains that
>Objective-C lacks.  What features of Objective-C make it "better"?
You answered your own question. The things about Objective-C that make
it better than C++ are all the features that C++ has that Objective-C
doesn't. NeXT, though, seem to be fixing that ;-)

>C++ is certainly more popular, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it is
>better.
Precisely.

>Thanks,
>-- Andy
That's fine,
-- Andy
-- 
Andy Newman (andy@research.canon.oz.au)		"int - God's own type"
Technical Details
Message-ID: <BtKuu4.HMy@research.canon.oz.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!mama!andy
References: <1992Aug25.142415.7762@uc.msc.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.objective-c,comp.lang.c++
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!mama!andy
From: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman)
Subject: Re: Objective-C vs. C++
Message-ID: <BtKuu4.HMy@research.canon.oz.au>
Sender: news@research.canon.oz.au
Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia
References: <1992Aug25.142415.7762@uc.msc.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 06:18:03 GMT
Lines: 18