Article View: comp.lang.objective-c
Article #55Re: Objective-C vs. C++
From: Fergus Henderson
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 17:27
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 17:27
28 lines
1686 bytes
1686 bytes
rmartin@thor.Rational.COM (Bob Martin) writes: >MKK2@psuvm.psu.edu writes: > >>One thing that makes Obj-C "better" is that it lacks a large number of features >>that C++ has but doesn't need. Computer science has been fighting the >>battle for a long time. Should a language offer every possible feature, >>or should it offer a slimmed down subset of just enough features? > >I am sure that you could find many C++ programmers who would agree >that the language is complex, and that there are features that could >be removed. I doubt you could get them all to agree on which features >to remove. There is one feature that C++ has that causes 90% of it's problems - C compatability. Unfortunately this is the last feature that people are willing to abandon. 1/2 :-) -- Fergus Henderson fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU This .signature VIRUS is a self-referential statement that is true - but you will only be able to consistently believe it if you copy it to your own .signature file! -- Fergus Henderson fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU This .signature VIRUS is a self-referential statement that is true - but you will only be able to consistently believe it if you copy it to your own .signature file!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9224103.3186@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!fjhReferences:
<1992Aug25.142415.7762@uc.msc.edu> <92238.232226MKK2@psuvm.psu.edu> <rmartin.714926059@thor>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.objective-c Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!fjh From: fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) Subject: Re: Objective-C vs. C++ Message-ID: <9224103.3186@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia References: <1992Aug25.142415.7762@uc.msc.edu> <92238.232226MKK2@psuvm.psu.edu> <rmartin.714926059@thor> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 17:27:27 GMT Lines: 28