🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.objective-c
Article #72

Re: Objective-C vs. C++

#72
From: Darcy Brockbank
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 13:10
26 lines
1401 bytes
In article <20@seltd.UUCP> lerman@seltd.UUCP (Kenneth Lerman) writes:
> One objection to runtime dispatching of messages which is often made
> by the C++ advocates is that you may get "doesNotRecognize" errors
> during runtime if your code is not statically checked by the compiler.
> My answer to this is:
>   You mean you don't test your code?

If you want to be more strict, you can also define variables as:

SomeClass *anObject;

Instead of:

id anObject;

And this will allow the compiler to check at compile time whether
or not "anObject" will respond to given selectors. (Unless the 
selectors are variables as well.)

- db

--
-------
I always thought that NeXTStep was very good in its approach to color since
the tasteless are protected from their own stupidity. -- Jason Breckenridge
(I know Jason, Jason is a close personal friend of mine, and I am not Jason!)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug31.131044.5117@cs.mcgill.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!homer.cs.mcgill.ca!news
References: <20@seltd.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!homer.cs.mcgill.ca!news
From: samurai@homer.cs.mcgill.ca (Darcy Brockbank)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.objective-c
Subject: Re: Objective-C vs. C++
Message-ID: <1992Aug31.131044.5117@cs.mcgill.ca>
Date: 31 Aug 92 13:10:44 GMT
References: <20@seltd.UUCP>
Sender: news@cs.mcgill.ca (Netnews Administrator)
Reply-To: samurai@uriel.cs.mgill.ca
Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Lines: 26