Thread View: comp.lang.objective-c
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Mike Goda
Thu, 14 Feb 1991 22:54
Opinion poll on OOPLs
Author: Mike Goda
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 1991 22:54
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 1991 22:54
121 lines
3885 bytes
3885 bytes
Magnus Ramstr|m posted this to a number of news groups but forgot the objective-c news group. Therefore I am posting it for him since it includes Objective-C in his questionnaire. > Path: stpstn!gaboon!crpmks!philabs!linus!think.com!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!udel!rochester!kodak!uupsi!sunic!kth.se!news > From: d87-mra@dront.nada.kth.se (Magnus Ramstr|m) > Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.object,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.smalltalk > Subject: Opinion poll on OOPLs > Message-ID: <1991Feb7.070324.22083@kth.se> > Date: 7 Feb 91 07:03:24 GMT > Sender: d87-mra > Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden > Lines: 102 > > Below is an inquiry I would be very grateful if you were to answer > (use Reply and fill in your answers at the given positions). Please > write comments after the answer line or at the end of your reply > (including references to simular inquiries). > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > General questions: > > 1. What OOPL do you usually use? > > a) C++, b) Objective-C, c) Simula, d) Eiffel, e) Smalltalk, f) Other (what?) > > Answer: > > 2. Is that the language you mainly use? > > a) Yes, b) No > > Answer: > > 3. For how long have you been using OO methods? (# of years) > > Answer: > > 4. How many academical courses on OO have you attended? > > Answer: > > 5. What is your educational level? > > a) Pre-graduate, b) Graduate, c) B.S, d) M.S, e) Dr, f) Other (what?) > > Answer: > > Opinion poll: > > 1. Do you agree with Peter Wegner's classification of programmming languages? > (BYTE March 1989) > > a) Yes, b) Yes, with minor adjustments, c) In some parts, d) No > > Answer: > > 2. Do you prefer the terms superclass/subclass or base class/derived class? > > a) superclass/subclass, b) base class/derived class, c) no opinion > > Answer: > > 3. Do you prefer hybrid languages or pure OOPL? > > a) hybrid languages, b) pure languages, c) no opinion > > Answer: > > 4. Do you prefer strong or weak typing in an OOPL? > > a) strong typing, b) weak typing, c) no opinion > > Answer: > > 5. Should classes be objects? > > a) Yes, b) No, c) No opinion > > Answer: > > 6. What type of syntax do you prefer? That of > > a) Simula, b) Smalltalk, c) CLOS, d) other (what?) > > Answer: > > 7. Which OOPL do you believe will be spread the most in a couple of years? > > a) C++, b) Objective-C, c) Simula, d) Eiffel, e) Smalltalk, f) Other (what?) > > Answer: > > 8. Which OOPL would you like to be spread the most in a couple of years? > > a) C++, b) Objective-C, c) Simula, d) Eiffel, e) Smalltalk, f) Other (what?) > > Answer: > > 9. What future do you believe there will be for class-less languages? > > a) Bright, b) Good, c) Bad, d) None > > Answer: > > 10. What future would you like there to be for class-less languages? > > a) Bright, b) Good, c) Bad, d) None > > Answer: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you! > d87-mra@nada.kth.se (Magnus Ramstr|m). Student @ Dep. of Computer Science. -- The Stepstone Corporation Michael Goda 75 Glen Rd. mikeg@stepstone.com Sandy Hook, CT 06482 uunet!stpstn!mikeg (203) 426-1875 fax (203)270-0106
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads