🚀 go-pugleaf

Dick Wisan wrote:

> I is illegal, of course, but I'm coming to think it shouldn't be.  If
> Borland _would_ sell the old versions, the standard rule would be
> perfectly fair, but they don't, and there's _nobody_ from whom you
> can legally get one of those small early versions any more.  If
> they refuse to sell them, we ought to be free to pass around what
> we have.

But you _are_ free to pass around anything you have. The problem arises
when computer software is involved. With software, you don't give it to
someone like you would, say, a car or a book; what you do is give a copy
of it, and this is where the copyright law says "no."

All you have to do is find someone who doesn't want their's anymore.

-- 
Fully 75% of my personal e-mail is unsolicited advertisement.
If you are a real person and have something to say to me then
remove the asterisk (*) from my reply-to address.
==> While you're at it, take a look at http://www.cauce.org/