Article View: comp.lang.pascal.borland
Article #562Re: Looking for Tp3, tp4, or tp5
From: Jared Showalter
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 00:00
46 lines
2801 bytes
2801 bytes
Mike Copeland wrote: > > > >> Please send me one of thoses programs. Thank you > > > > > > Highly unlikely that anyone would do this, since it's illegal and > > >unethical to do so (not to mention being the recipient of such software). > > >Turbo Pascal - even old versions - has always been a commercial product. > > > > I is illegal, of course, but I'm coming to think it shouldn't be. If > > Borland _would_ sell the old versions, the standard rule would be > > perfectly fair, but they don't, and there's _nobody_ from whom you > > can legally get one of those small early versions any more. If > > they refuse to sell them, we ought to be free to pass around what > > we have. > > What we feel is reasonable or proper isn't the issue here, since > Borland has the legal right to prohibit such distribution. As a > practical matter, they probably wouldn't sue someone who did so, but who > knows? I wouldn't take the chance, regardless of my ethics which > wouldn't permit me to do it - I continue to honor Borland's right to do > this. I think the problem is that some of the compiler code (in highly modified form, I hope) is still in use in products like Delphi. My copy of Delphi 1.0 is Copyright *1983* to 1995. If they fail to protect their copyright on the older programs, another software company could take them to court and have the copyright revoked because Borland isn't trying to uphold it. Then portions of the Delphi compiler would be in the public domain, which wouldn't be good. Of course, they could still distribute TP 5 and below under a license for unlimited distribution but with restrictions on reverse engineering. I'm not sure how sound any of this is legally but it would partially explain what they're doing. > > Does _Borland_ take the view that we should be setting up with GNU > > Pascal & such? > > I doubt Borland cares at all. If they did, they'd be right out there > in the marketplace with a highly competitive 32 bit DOS product (which > they are obviously not doing...). -- Jared Showalter Remove the REMOVETHIS from my address to reply.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<343D317A.F697E4BE@gate.REMOVETHIS.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3438CB48.707A@wanadoo.fr> <MPG.ea36ad12510d270989769@news.primenet.com> <61esn3$k0u@news2.zippo.com> <MPG.ea4d1c53d12fdfa98976c@news.primenet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108ebd,78ff7ea8e07a287a X-Google-Attributes: gid108ebd,public X-Google-Thread: 111659,a54ef0ef7dd74c02 X-Google-Attributes: gid111659,public From: Jared Showalter <shonwald@gate.REMOVETHIS.net> Subject: Re: Looking for Tp3, tp4, or tp5 Date: 1997/10/09 Message-ID: <343D317A.F697E4BE@gate.REMOVETHIS.net> X-Deja-AN: 279050060 References: <3438CB48.707A@wanadoo.fr> <MPG.ea36ad12510d270989769@news.primenet.com> <61esn3$k0u@news2.zippo.com> <MPG.ea4d1c53d12fdfa98976c@news.primenet.com> Organization: CyberGate, Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal.borland,borland.public.turbopascal