Why is PASCAL long forgotten now ? ? ?

Article View: comp.lang.pascal.borland

Article #570

Back to comp.lang.pascal.borland Previous Next

#570

From: Brian Raab
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 04:04

4 lines
965 bytes

It was better as "C" and almost as good as BASIC, so I wonder why
everybody uses C instead of Pascal or BASIC ???

I see no advantage in C.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8d001dc6.0410072004.1a82a3c@posting.google.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 111659,fc520906c013198,start
X-Google-Thread: f70d0,fc520906c013198,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid111659,gidf70d0,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: kaisers_sun@yahoo.com (Brian Raab)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal.borland,can.vlsi
Subject: Why is PASCAL long forgotten now ? ? ?
Date: 7 Oct 2004 21:04:39 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <8d001dc6.0410072004.1a82a3c@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.222.179.202
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1097208280 31098 127.0.0.1 (8 Oct 2004 04:04:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 04:04:40 +0000 (UTC)