Article View: comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc
Article #435Re: Opinion yours ... which is better, a "demo" or a "money-back guarantee?"
From: Bj�rge S�ther
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 00:00
50 lines
3329 bytes
3329 bytes
"Sundial Services" <info@sundialservices.com> skrev i melding news:3A037D7E.3132@sundialservices.com... > (thin smile...) I shall never permit our product to do anything but its > very best for anyone's table, if it chooses to take-on processing that > table. Modifying data, adding passwords, or anything of the sort is > completely unconscionable. But - is this such a bad idea ? Say a customer with one of my Delphi/Paradox applications gets into a typical (but not so frequent) Paradox crash. I provided him with a simple tool for rebuilding a new database, copying data into the new tables, recreating indices. Still no luck. OK, I search for ChimneySweep, download a test version. It says: This evaluation version is fully functional, but it modifies random data. You may then check out if it actually fixes your database problem before purchasing. DO ALLWAYS KEEP A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL DATA ! Or, you may add a SCRAMBLED table, storing information about what was modified for a reversion when proper License ID is entered. > Obviously I -am- pondering the strategies for ChimneySweep�, which has > some unusual market characteristics formed by the nature of what it does > and the fact that it is often picked-up like a fire extinguisher .. when > there IS a fire. I believe there are two issues here: - Is ChimneySweep the right tool for these problems ? - How can I purchase it, not now but NOW ? I believe the first problem is the most precious: Do we have a solution ? You ususlly may live with waiting for a few hours if you *know* you've got the solution. > But, I am also pondering the feelings that I do have when -I- buy > software, which is that I have usually made up my purchase decision > -before- I download anything. And if, after having taken it home and > tried it on I decide it simply does not fit ... Will anyone distribute your application when you have a money-back clause with your package ? Well, this is my opinion, of course, and I'm no average software buyer...with me you wouldn't have to protect anything - I allways pay (even WinZip !) ...;-) -- Bjoerge Saether Consultant / Developer Asker, Norway bsaether.removethis@online.no (remove the obvious)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JaSM5.2538$mx.58375@news1.oke.nextra.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A0317E5.630C@sundialservices.com> <hSGM5.2365$mx.53932@news1.oke.nextra.no> <3A037D7E.3132@sundialservices.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 109d99,2bb422eb08221e84 X-Google-Attributes: gid109d99,public X-Google-Thread: 10baee,2bb422eb08221e84 X-Google-Attributes: gid10baee,public X-Google-Thread: f8256,2bb422eb08221e84 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8256,public From: "Bj�rge S�ther" <REMOVE_bsaether@THIS_online.no> Subject: Re: Opinion yours ... which is better, a "demo" or a "money-back guarantee?" Date: 2000/11/04 Message-ID: <JaSM5.2538$mx.58375@news1.oke.nextra.no> X-Deja-AN: 689559738 References: <3A0317E5.630C@sundialservices.com> <hSGM5.2365$mx.53932@news1.oke.nextra.no> <3A037D7E.3132@sundialservices.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@nextra.no X-Trace: news1.oke.nextra.no 973336361 130.67.107.176 (Sat, 04 Nov 2000 12:12:41 MET) Organization: Nextra Public Access X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 12:12:41 MET Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.components.misc,borland.public.delphi.thirdparty-tools