Article View: comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc
Article #682Re: Buffon's Needles
From: Earl F. Glynn
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:00
51 lines
3536 bytes
3536 bytes
Dr John Stockton <jrs@merlyn.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:zZIi7jAzW8c3EwDD@merlyn.demon.co.uk... > >It will be interesting to see whether you've managed to avoid using a > >value for Pi, implicitly or explicitly, in the work. > Method 4 uses half-angle and angle-addition formulae to generate sines > and cosines of evenly-spaced angles, starting with a "unit" of one > right-angle There was no angle-addition formula used in Method 4. The half-angle recurrence formulas only involves a SQRT, not any trig function. The starting value is 0.0, i.e., cos(90 degrees). The generated sequences of SIN and COS values from the recurrence relationship were just algebraic expressions. Is your objection to an "implicit" use of PI because SINs and COSs were used in the explanation? Sure seems like this could have been expressed totally algebraically, e.g., SIN(angle) = x / SQRT(x^2 + y^2) and if SQRT(x^2 + y^2) = 1, then SIN(angle) = x. But expressing the relationships using the trig functions made everything more understandable. I don't see any dependence on PI here. I guess I haven't proven I can derive the half-angle formula using only geometry without a dependence on PI. Certainly everything can be expressed just algebraically. Once a sufficiently small angle was generated, namely 1/(2^N)-th of a circle, angular rotation [not angle-addition] was used to generate a uniform sequence of points along a circular path. While the rotation matrix was expressed using SINs and COSs, the values were calculated using only the algebraic expressions of the half-angle recurrence formula (above). So these points were all calculated using nothing more complicated than a SQRT -- i.e., no trig functions. What is the explicit dependence on PI in Method 4? What is the implicit dependence on PI in Method 4? >I guess that the true intention was to draw attention to the services >you provide at efg's Computer Lab My true intentions aren't any different than yours when you answer math questions in the various newsgroups, or any author publishing any paper. efg _________________________________ efg's Computer Lab: http://www.efg2.com/lab Delphi Books: http://www.efg2.com/lab/TechBooks/Delphi.htm Earl F. Glynn E-Mail: EarlGlynn@att.net Overland Park, KS USA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7l165c$gqa$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7ks8ls$mgk$1@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net><Im0c0MABmjc3Ew2K@merlyn.demon.co.uk> <zZIi7jAzW8c3EwDD@merlyn.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a726,d24982a2aa52a35f X-Google-Attributes: gid10a726,public X-Google-Thread: 105ac8,d24982a2aa52a35f X-Google-Attributes: gid105ac8,public X-Google-Thread: 10baee,d24982a2aa52a35f X-Google-Attributes: gid10baee,public X-Google-Thread: 109585,d24982a2aa52a35f X-Google-Attributes: gid109585,public X-Google-Thread: 10a7f1,d24982a2aa52a35f X-Google-Attributes: gid10a7f1,public From: "Earl F. Glynn" <EarlGlynn@att.net> Subject: Re: Buffon's Needles Date: 1999/06/25 Message-ID: <7l165c$gqa$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> X-Deja-AN: 493966234 References: <7ks8ls$mgk$1@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net><Im0c0MABmjc3Ew2K@merlyn.demon.co.uk> <zZIi7jAzW8c3EwDD@merlyn.demon.co.uk> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net 930356204 17226 12.75.141.7 (26 Jun 1999 00:16:44 GMT) Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Jun 1999 00:16:44 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,alt.comp.borland-delphi,de.comp.lang.pascal.delphi,fr.comp.lang.pascal,es.comp.lenguajes.delphi