🚀 go-pugleaf

just read a thing here:
In July 1969,the US Army was given a $10 million budget to develop a
synthetic biological agent targeting the immune saystem.By 1990 a quietly
declassified Nation Security Memo (MSN 200) written by Henry
Kissinger,Nixon's National Security advisor,outlined the US's concern over
Third World population.It states "Reduction of the popluation in these
states is a matter of vital US national security"
This has led some observers to conclude that the AIDS virus may have been
designed as part of this covert BW project.

The dates dont appear to be correct,i imagine AIDS was around a bit before
69.
althought lots of scientists think that it first came about in the early 70s
because a infected monkey bit a human,so mabye the first story is true?


--
ICQ UIN: 6036731
phie site: http://dac.org/users/phie/right.html
phie zine: http://phiezine.zeris.net/
IRC: #hackers_ireland,#hackerzlair,#2600-uk.

dan the man wrote in message ...
>On Mon, 27 Jul 1998, Elektrify wrote:
>
>> Firestarter wrote in message <6pigjn$inj29@scotty.tinet.ie>...
>> >finally someone who agrees with me
>> >i have read lots about AIDS being invented,and try to stick with the
>> >evidence,in this case their isnt much
>>
>> I thought that AIDS is a metamorphosis of a disease carried by a specific
>> bread of monkey in Africa somewhere.  I can remember where I heard but it
>> was something to do with contact between these monkeys and humans,
someone
>> said sexual but I doubt it.  Aids is apparently only deadly to humans and
>> this one bread of monkeys.  NOT apes..Monkeys.
>
>Hmmm it's a possibility, but SIV (Simian Immunodeficiency Virus) probably
>would not be able to infect human cells under normal circumstances.
>Zoonotic diseases (ie ones which transmit across the species barrier) are
>rare.  Influenza is one that does and which has a transmission pattern :
>
>ducks <---->pigs<---->humans
>
>This is a pain, becuase it allows great diversity of the virus - and one
>reason why it is particularly hard to eliminate.  This is obviously made
>easier by it's transmission through droplets as opposed to exchange of
>body fluids as in HIV, but if HIV could freely cross species barriers, we
>would be facing a longer, harder battle.
>
>Another point : wasn't the first known AIDS related death in the
>late 1950's?  I'm sure I saw a program that had some research institution
>analysing old tissue sections for traces of HIV, and found some candidate
>who died of an 'unknown disease' ie AIDS.
>
>keeping ph.uk off topic and crossposting wildly,
>
>dan
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>| dan@hole-in-the.net AntiArchangel#28 on newbie.darkridge.com |
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>|For PGP v5.0 Key please see: black.hole-in-the.net/dan/pgp.txt|
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>