🚀 go-pugleaf

I guess im out and out mad then!
although unlike the original poster im prity sure i know what im talking
about.


--
ICQ UIN: 6036731
phie site: http://dac.org/users/phie/right.html
phie zine: http://phiezine.zeris.net/
IRC: #hackers_ireland,#hackerzlair,#2600-uk.

Slithey Tove wrote in message ...
>
>- wrote in message <35ba30e3.154647824@news2.cais.com>...
>>"Daniel (dS=dQ/T) Key" <daniel@all-keys.demon.co.uk> Said this:
>>
>>>
>>>blowclinton@my-dejanews.com wrote in message
>>><6pc4eu$32r$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>>>>Okay...
>>>>
>>>>A friend of mine, whose identity must remain anonymous has agreed for me
>to
>>>>let everyone know what she has seen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>---------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Remember the SR-71, created and operational in the 1950's and
>de-classified
>>>>in the 1990's???  In 1950, conventional science and technology could
>never
>>>>have designed the SR-71, yet a SUPER SECRET facility out in the Nevada
>>>desert
>>>>was it's birthplace.  This technology in 1950, quote "did not exist"
>>>unquote.
>>>> Any sighting of the SR-71 was excused as fantasy and the product of
>>>>hallucinations.
>>> ------------- snip----------------
>>>
>>>
>>>OK, I've read this post three times and it still makes minimal sense, but
>I
>>>have a question for the voices in your head. What is it about the SR-71
>that
>>>could not have been built in the late 60's-early 70's (when it was
>>>*actually* designed/constructed) ?
>>>--
>>
>>I suppose this person is not very proficient in the science of
>>constructing a plausible conspiracy theory.
>
><remainder deleted>
>
>     No, because this person is a schizophrenic. Either that, or a troll
who
>has worked with schizophrenics and knows how they think. His penultimate
>paragraph is a textbook example of a common schizophrenic delusion,
'thought
>insertion' and 'thought deletion' by radio control.
>
>     There's no point in arguing with him or trying to convince him of the
>absurdity of his views. You're not arguing with a person capable of reason,
>but with a faulty dopaminergic synapse. (Or with a troll impersonating a
>person with faulty dopaminergic synapses, which is just as pointless.)
>
>     These folks do show up on Usenet occasionally. Schizophrenia is
common.
>One percent of every population that has been studied suffers from it. It
is
>a tragic and disabling disease. This fellow deserves our sympathy, but
>there's no point in arguing with him or getting angry with him.
>
>-- Tove
>
>