🚀 go-pugleaf

- wrote in message <35ba30e3.154647824@news2.cais.com>...
>"Daniel (dS=dQ/T) Key" <daniel@all-keys.demon.co.uk> Said this:
>
>>
>>blowclinton@my-dejanews.com wrote in message
>><6pc4eu$32r$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>>>Okay...
>>>
>>>A friend of mine, whose identity must remain anonymous has agreed for me
to
>>>let everyone know what she has seen.
>>>
>>>
>>>---------
>>>
>>>
>>>Remember the SR-71, created and operational in the 1950's and
de-classified
>>>in the 1990's???  In 1950, conventional science and technology could
never
>>>have designed the SR-71, yet a SUPER SECRET facility out in the Nevada
>>desert
>>>was it's birthplace.  This technology in 1950, quote "did not exist"
>>unquote.
>>> Any sighting of the SR-71 was excused as fantasy and the product of
>>>hallucinations.
>> ------------- snip----------------
>>
>>
>>OK, I've read this post three times and it still makes minimal sense, but
I
>>have a question for the voices in your head. What is it about the SR-71
that
>>could not have been built in the late 60's-early 70's (when it was
>>*actually* designed/constructed) ?
>>--
>
>I suppose this person is not very proficient in the science of
>constructing a plausible conspiracy theory.

<remainder deleted>

     No, because this person is a schizophrenic. Either that, or a troll who
has worked with schizophrenics and knows how they think. His penultimate
paragraph is a textbook example of a common schizophrenic delusion, 'thought
insertion' and 'thought deletion' by radio control.

     There's no point in arguing with him or trying to convince him of the
absurdity of his views. You're not arguing with a person capable of reason,
but with a faulty dopaminergic synapse. (Or with a troll impersonating a
person with faulty dopaminergic synapses, which is just as pointless.)

     These folks do show up on Usenet occasionally. Schizophrenia is common.
One percent of every population that has been studied suffers from it. It is
a tragic and disabling disease. This fellow deserves our sympathy, but
there's no point in arguing with him or getting angry with him.

-- Tove