🚀 go-pugleaf

true
amazing what scientists can do with money
is anyone familar with Nikola Tesla?
a man totally ahead of his time
he was able to use electricity in a controllable form and without him we may
be in the dark ages
like many other people like him he was ridiculed mainly because people
couldnt yet grasp his way of thinking,he made a Tesla coil
a rod which is supposed to create earthquakes,he has rumoured to be the
cause of many earthequakes in his time and again if anyone knows about Aum
Shinryko the japanese cult that gassed the tokyo subways with sarin gas they
will know that Aum members were testing a remake of the tesla coil in the
desert which was never prooven cos Nicola was stoped and became a hermit
towards the end of his life before proveing his invention
only now is he apretiated
ive gone out on a limb here but my main point is not to assume that it is of
ET origin just because someone is ahead of their years


--
ICQ UIN: 6036731
phie site: http://dac.org/users/phie/right.html
phie zine: http://phiezine.zeris.net/
IRC: #hackers_ireland,#hackerzlair,#2600-uk.

- wrote in message <35ba30e3.154647824@news2.cais.com>...
>"Daniel (dS=dQ/T) Key" <daniel@all-keys.demon.co.uk> Said this:
>
>>
>>blowclinton@my-dejanews.com wrote in message
>><6pc4eu$32r$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>>>Okay...
>>>
>>>A friend of mine, whose identity must remain anonymous has agreed for me
to
>>>let everyone know what she has seen.
>>>
>>>
>>>---------
>>>
>>>
>>>Remember the SR-71, created and operational in the 1950's and
de-classified
>>>in the 1990's???  In 1950, conventional science and technology could
never
>>>have designed the SR-71, yet a SUPER SECRET facility out in the Nevada
>>desert
>>>was it's birthplace.  This technology in 1950, quote "did not exist"
>>unquote.
>>> Any sighting of the SR-71 was excused as fantasy and the product of
>>>hallucinations.
>> ------------- snip----------------
>>
>>
>>OK, I've read this post three times and it still makes minimal sense, but
I
>>have a question for the voices in your head. What is it about the SR-71
that
>>could not have been built in the late 60's-early 70's (when it was
>>*actually* designed/constructed) ?
>>--
>
>I suppose this person is not very proficient in the science of
>constructing a plausible conspiracy theory.
>
>If you have done even a minimal amount of research on the SR-71 or the
>U2, for that matter, you can gain some very real knowledge of a
>as-of-yet unclassified technology.
>
>To try to claim that it was some kind of "alien" or extra-terrestrial
>technology is ridiculous.  Yes, it is amazing to consider that the guy
>that designed the plane, at the skunk works facility, did create an
>amazing plane using basically just a slide-rule.  However, that's not
>testament to alien knowledge.  It's a testament to the power of the
>human brain (and gobs of cash from the government).
>
>If it was created by a superior intelligence, then how come they still
>haven't solved the one major problem with the plane, which is that
>they do not have a material pliable enough to expand and contract
>evenly - the plane had to be constructed with large gaps in the fuel
>tanks, so much so that it HAS TO refuel after take off because it
>leaks so much fuel that by the time it is airborne the tanks are
>practically empty.  How come our friendly extra-terrestrial
>aeronautics consultant couldn't share the solution to that problem?
>
>