Re: Bad PostScript by Windows.

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #1367

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#1367

From: Laura Halliday
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1989 21:56

12 lines
945 bytes

Though I haven't seen the PostScript Windows cranks out, I've certainly seen
what MS Word 5 cranks out. 

No fun.

Do people have any favourite `acid tests' they use to get some idea of
PostScript compatibility? My current one is to download the PostScript file
onto our NeXT and let Preview image it. It's the only non-LaserWriter
PostScript implementation I have access to, and the results can be useful.

...laura

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5769@ubc-cs.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!cheddar.cc.ubc.ca!halliday

References: <12877@polya.Stanford.EDU> <1529@cc.helsinki.fi>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!cheddar.cc.ubc.ca!halliday
From: halliday@cheddar.cc.ubc.ca (Laura Halliday)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Bad PostScript by Windows.
Summary: Ouch.
Message-ID: <5769@ubc-cs.UUCP>
Date: 24 Nov 89 21:56:34 GMT
References: <12877@polya.Stanford.EDU> <1529@cc.helsinki.fi>
Sender: news@cs.ubc.ca
Reply-To: halliday@cc.ubc.ca (Laura Halliday)
Organization: UBC Computing Centre, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message