Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #1602What can you do to font dictionaries?
From: Amanda Walker
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1990 01:39
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1990 01:39
20 lines
1454 bytes
1454 bytes
In the red book under the definition of "scalefont", it says that the operator makes a copy of the specified font dictionary with a new FontMatrix entry. What I am wondering is whether it's legal to write functions that do similar things with other entries in the font dictionary. In particular, writing an "encodefont" procedure that makes a copy of a font dictionary with a new encoding vector (but *not* registering it under a new name with definefont) seems to work just fine under every version of Adobe PostScript that I've tried. Since the font cache works on FID/character name pairs, it doesn't strike me that doing this would confuse the font cache. My particular application in this case is to create a Type 3 font which uses re-encoded versions of a couple existing fonts, but which don't ever get referred to explicitly anywhere else. Does anyone know of any problems with this or prohibitions against it in Adobe technotes? Amanda Walker InterCon Systems Corporation --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Jan23.013927.3977@intercon.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!intercon!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!intercon!news From: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: What can you do to font dictionaries? Message-ID: <1990Jan23.013927.3977@intercon.com> Date: 23 Jan 90 01:39:27 GMT Sender: @intercon.com Reply-To: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker) Organization: InterCon Systems Corporation, Sterling, VA Lines: 20