Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #192Re: Newbie ps vs type 1 vs type 3 font question...
From: Scott Byer
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 17:27
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 17:27
48 lines
2743 bytes
2743 bytes
games@max.u.washington.edu writes > Now, what exactly are adobe type 1 (truetype) and adobe type 3 fonts. The Type 1 font format has nothing to do with TrueType, which is another font format defined by Apple. The Type 1 font format has been around quite a while, and is used on a wide variety of platforms to obtain scalable fonts. The Type 1 font format is a compact way of describing a font outline using a well-defined language that can be quickly interpreted. The language contains operations to provide the rasterizer with additional information about a character, known as hints. The Type 1 font format is defined in the book "The Adobe Type 1 Font Format", also known as the black-and-white book, for the colors on it's cover. The Type 3 font format is a way of packaging up PostScript descriptions of characters into a font, so that the PostScript interpreter can rasterize them. It is often easier to create a Type 3 font program by hand than to create the corresponding Type 1 font program. Type 3 font programs have access to the entire PostScript language to do their imaging, including the 'image' operator. They can be used for bitmapped fonts, although that is certainly not a requirement. The Type 3 font format contains no provisions for 'hinting', and as such Type 3 font programs cannot be of as high a quality at low resolutions as the corresponding Type 1 font program. Both formats are scalable formats, and both can be run on any PostScript interpreter. However, because of the requirement that a Type 3 font program have a full PostScript interpreter around, Type 3 font programs cannot be understood by the Adobe Type Manager. Only Type 1 font programs can. Because of Adobe Type Manager's wide availability on a large number of platforms (PC, Mac, and Unix), the Type 1 font format makes an excellent cross-platform scalable font standard. Scott Byer NeXTMail: byer@adobe.com Adobe Systems Incorporated These are *my* opinions, and 1585 Charleston Road, P.O. Box 7900 do not necessarily reflect Mountain View, CA 94039-7900 the opinions of my employer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug4.172708.11479@adobe.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!morrow.stanford.edu!decwrl!adobe!usenetReferences:
<1992Aug3.155922.1@max.u.washington.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!morrow.stanford.edu!decwrl!adobe!usenet From: byer@adobe.com (Scott Byer) Subject: Re: Newbie ps vs type 1 vs type 3 font question... Message-ID: <1992Aug4.172708.11479@adobe.com> Sender: usenet@adobe.com (USENET NEWS) Reply-To: byer@adobe.com (Scott Byer) Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated References: <1992Aug3.155922.1@max.u.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1992 17:27:08 GMT Lines: 48