Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #2134Re: 68030 etcct
From: Woody Baker Eagle Signal
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 1990 00:25
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 1990 00:25
11 lines
867 bytes
867 bytes
How is the recent decision by the court over the 68030 going to effect PS? I am wondering howmany new printers that is going to put a hold on? On a related topic, the Canon MarKIII printer has a postscript upgrade. The MarkIII is not 68000 based. Does anyone know what CPU is used? How many other (other than 68000) types of CPU's has true Adobe Postscript been implented on? Cheers Woody
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1151@chinacat.Unicom.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!execu!sequoia!chinacat!woodyReferences:
<3470@dogie.macc.wisc.edu> <3405@optilink.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!execu!sequoia!chinacat!woody From: woody@chinacat.Unicom.COM (Woody Baker @ Eagle Signal) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: 68030 etcct Summary: lawsuit Message-ID: <1151@chinacat.Unicom.COM> Date: 14 Apr 90 00:25:51 GMT References: <3470@dogie.macc.wisc.edu> <3405@optilink.UUCP> Organization: a guest of Unicom Systems Development, Austin Lines: 11