Agfa P400 resolution (was: Re: compensating for distortion)

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #2264

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#2264

From: C.E. Thompson
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 1990 15:26

18 lines
1079 bytes

In article <1237@mtxinu.UUCP> jaap@mtxinu.UUCP (Jaap Akkerhuis) writes:
>
>But why are 300dpi printers not 300 in general? At the introduction
>of the Agfa P400 they told me the next story:
>
>Their printer is marketed as a 400 dpi model, but if you really
>look in the specs, it is actually something like a 406 dpi.  The
>406 dpi make a nice figure in a metric system.
>
>H'm, if you get your calculator out you can see that that doesn't
>make a lot of sense, so it might be yet another urban legend.
>

It makes sense to me: 16/mm = 406.4/in.

Chris Thompson
JANET:    cet1@uk.ac.cam.phx
Internet: cet1%phx.cam.ac.uk@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1916@gannet.cl.cam.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!cam-cl!cet1

References: <1237@mtxinu.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!cam-cl!cet1
From: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Agfa P400 resolution (was: Re: compensating for distortion)
Message-ID: <1916@gannet.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: 2 Jun 90 15:26:43 GMT
References: <1237@mtxinu.UUCP>
Sender: news@cl.cam.ac.uk
Reply-To: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
Organization: U of Cambridge Comp Lab, UK
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message